(Winnie the Pooh Blood and Honey / Jagged Edge Productions)

Social media is generally not a fan of copyright restrictions, considering how often incredible projects featuring copyrighted characters have been shut down by the IP owners in the past, but the recent trailer for Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey has some reevaluating if copyright laws do the world some good.

The Premiere Entertainment and Jagged Edge Productions horror flick made headlines when it was announced to be in production earlier this year after Disney's hold on the Winnie the Pooh IP expired, which meant the character officially became public domain. Shortly afterward, Winnie the Pooh: Blood and Honey, a horror film directed by Rhys Frake-Waterfield, was announced to the world's trepidation and curiosity.

Judging by the film's newly released trailer, the movie appears to follow slasher film tropes, with humanoid versions of Pooh and his pal Piglet taking the role of a Jason Voorhees type. The pair apparently grow murderous when Christopher Robin moves away to college.

Frake-Waterfield explained in May, "Because they’ve had to fend for themselves so much, they’ve essentially become feral, so they’ve gone back to their animal roots. They’re no longer tame: they’re like a vicious bear and pig who want to go around and try and find prey."

Social media seemed largely perplexed and depressed by the trailer, noting it looked like a standard low-budget horror affair notable only for its recognizable children's characters. Furthermore, the choice to make such a movie with characters as historically wholesome as Pooh and Piglet struck many as existentially depressing.

However, as they say, no press is bad press, and despite the negative reactions to the movie on social media so far, some expressed their intent to see it anyway.


Share Pin


Comments 10 total

Blue2

I hate that this movie itself exists, but I'm glad that they can make and release the same movie without any issues.

0

callsoutyourtrsh

Defending Disney abusive use of copyright, that hurts our culture going back decades, because some shlock triggred you as much as some youtube animation would over being "depressing" is beyond vile, its actual astroturfing or proof that some terminally online manbbyes will never mature enough past the mental age of 4, the author clearly being one.

Social media didnt find it "depressing" cause most didnt care about this shlock, a few manbbys you cherry picked being karenfied enough to seethe over trashy horror using "wholesome" imagery (as if using wholesome as a buzzword didnt already made you a huge manbaby) "did" for likes, but nobody with more maturity than a toddler raised by soccer moms would be able to be emotionally hurt by it, and getting triggered by it in the age of youtube allowing parodies for much longers smells of either disney shill or some joke that thinks twitter is a big deal

This joke of an article is worse than many clickbait sites, now I know where all those failing kotaku/gizmodo writers are running to, making clickbait for a meme site that was never about articles in the first place lmao

-1

ImperatorZor

1: Take iconic innocent thing.
2: Take stock horror set-up.
3: Put iconography of A onto B.

You too can be a hack horror schlock writer!

0

callsoutyourtrsh

Id rather 1000s of shlocks like that as long as it keeps disney shills and astroturfers seething that they couldnt abuse the copyright law another century, same with the manbabies getting triggered by shlock horror movies, any slasher would break a manbaby in half if a sloppy bs like that causes a reaction

-1

ObadiahtheSlim

And who knows, maybe one of the hack horror schlock writers might come across the next Big Thing.

After all, I'm a big believer that nobody has the monopoly on good ideas.

0

RagingGhost

I'm only there since Disney kept screwing copyright laws in their favor, so karma.

1

Phhase

Hotline Miami 3: Bargain Bin

0

Phhase

Payday 3: Bargain Bin

-1

Nox Lucis

I mean, the premise is obviously shitpost material. People didn't actually expect this to be a good movie, did they?

6

callsoutyourtrsh

Clearly so, the author is either a seething disney fanboy or just a desperate screenrant/gizmo tier """writer""" trying too hard to stir bs while being unable to grasp even a shitpost

-1
pinterest