Social Media Sites De-platform Trump After Mob Storms Capitol Building
Social media sites have taken extraordinary steps to de-platform the President of the United States after yesterday's riot at Capitol Hill, citing the President's role on their platforms in inciting "violent insurrection."
Twitter took the first steps yesterday, banning Trump for 12 hours after he posted a video in which he told the members of the mob "We love you" and "you're very special" while urging them to go home and complaining about a stolen election.
The Twitter Safety account made the announcement yesterday that they required the removal of three of Trump's tweets, including his video, and that his account would be suspended for twelve hours. If the tweets were not removed, the account would remain locked. Trump has yet to tweet since the announcement.
This means that the account of @realDonaldTrump will be locked for 12 hours following the removal of these Tweets. If the Tweets are not removed, the account will remain locked.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) January 7, 2021
Mark Zuckerberg followed, announcing that the President's Facebook and Instagram accounts would be suspended at least until Joe Biden is inaugurated on January 20th but possibly indefinitely after that.
“The shocking events of the last 24 hours clearly demonstrate that President Donald Trump intends to use his remaining time in office to undermine the peaceful and lawful transition of power to his elected successor, Joe Biden,” Zuckerberg wrote. While Facebook has maintained a laissez-faire attitude on Trump's account in the past, Zuckerberg appeared to imply that the insurrection at the Capitol was the final straw.
"The current context is now fundamentally different, involving use of our platform to incite violent insurrection against a democratically elected government," he wrote.
The shocking events of the last 24 hours clearly demonstrate that President Donald Trump intends to use his remaining…
Posted by Mark Zuckerberg on Thursday, January 7, 2021
YouTube also announced crackdowns on any channel which posts widespread misinformation about the election, including Trump's channel. YouTube introduced a policy in December that banned such videos, but until today, its policy was to have the videos removed. Now, channels posting such videos will receive a strike that will prevent them from uploading new content.
Calls for restrictions on Trump's social media accounts have been common throughout his Presidency as many feared his incendiary tweets would lead to violence. For many, the move to restrict Trump's social media accounts after the Capitol insurrection and with fourteen days left in his Presidency was too little, too late.
Lot of folks inside FB not exactly happy that it took literal fomenting of insurrection to earn Trump a platform ban (for maybe 14 days?)https://t.co/GSG2fLDOcf
— rat king (@MikeIsaac) January 7, 2021
Donald Trump handed whopping 12-hour Twitter ban after falling foul of the platform’s ‘no incitement of deadly insurrections that threaten national security’ policy.
— Have I Got News For You (@haveigotnews) January 7, 2021
📝STATEMENT📝 – January 6, 2021Real Facebook Oversight Board: 24 Hour Ban on Trump Too Little Too Late pic.twitter.com/AK1zluqloC
— The Real Facebook Oversight Board (@FBoversight) January 7, 2021
Share Pin
downer
Didn't he literally tell them to go home? Not a fan of the man in general, since it apparently needs to be declared when saying stuff like this, but that sounds like the opposite of incitement.
supergoron
He was also still telling them that the election was stolen as well.
dirtymonkey
I think it was the "this is what happens" tweet that did it.
Chewybunny
Out of curiosity is this applicable to Leaders of other countries? Or is it just ours?
Timey16
Why not, Twitter can do whatever. It's a private company.
Contrary to popular belief, the constitution only applies in one direction: from government to citizens. So the GOVERNMENT can't take away your guns, the GOVERNMENT can't censor you etc.
Private entities can do that to some degrees, because rights regarding private on private encounters are encoded in the Bill of Rights. Still an important document, just not "constitution important".
wisehowl_the_2nd
Explain to me how a company censoring you is justifiable over a government censoring you.
downer
The cultural ideal of freedom of speech extends a lot further than just the US constitution. People don't just value free speech because their constitution says so.
Which is to say, Twitter can do whatever, but that's a meaningless truism, because the obvious implication by critics is that they shouldn't.
view the rest of this conversation →
Kekkles the Kek
About 4 years too late, there.