(Twitter / @VABVOX and The New Yorker)

A satirical article in The New Yorker spoofing the text messages between former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and conservative activist Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, has been interpreted by many on Twitter as real news and circulated widely.

Real texts between Thomas and Meadows, shared with the press and January 6th committee, show the Supreme Court spouse allegedly helping the Trump administration push false claims that the election was stolen and reporting back to Meadows about her efforts to pressure legislators in Arizona and Pennsylvania.

Many are disturbed by how involved Thomas purportedly was in the effort to overturn the election because her husband is a Supreme Court justice, and back in March, he was the only member of the Court to vote in favor of letting Donald Trump withhold January 6th documents from the committee.

The satirical texts feature Thomas and Meadows figuring out financing for “coup buses,” with Thomas asking Meadows to Venmo money to an account linked to her husband’s work email. Missing the satire, a number of posters thought the texts were real.

The most prominent post saying the texts were real was liked over 24,000 times and falsely attributes the story to CNN. The account, LilSoldierMa (@Nelva31501410) appears to be a sincere left-wing political poster that joined the platform in November 2020 and has 322 followers.

In the replies to the post, many took the time to debunk the false claims and let people know it was satire. Several different posters did this by sharing a screenshot of the original New Yorker article.

Alongside these, others posted memes mocking the Thomases.

The original New Yorker post, which was shared yesterday morning, only received around 300 likes.

The House January 6th Committee has sent a letter to Ginni Thomas and asked for her to appear and testify. Meanwhile, calls are growing for Justice Clarence Thomas to resign or recuse himself from cases involving Trump and the events of January 6th.

John Eastman, the legal scholar Donald Trump reportedly relied on to formulate the theory that Mike Pence could overturn the 2020 Presidential Election, is closely linked to the Thomases and many expect more information about Ginni’s involvement to come out soon.

The Supreme Court continues to face an escalating legitimacy problem, one which Justice Elena Kagan highlighted in oral arguments on a current case (Vega v. Tekoh) considering the future of Miranda rights, wondering how overturning the precedent of Miranda rights (like some of her more conservative colleagues on the 6-3 seemed in favor of) would affect the public's perception of the "legitimacy of the Court."

The Court has also been rocked by the leak of a draft decision purportedly overturning Roe v. Wade in May, which saw significant public pushback.


Share Pin


Comments 1 total

Timstuff

It's interesting that the court did not have a "legitimacy problem" until it stopped giving rulings that were favorable to the party in power.

-1
pinterest