(Twitter / @mattybtweets69)

On August 6th, 2021, Twitter user @Mattybtweets69 tweeted, "If the Mona Lisa was painted today, she would have big boobs, be taking a 'selfie,' have a cellphone, huge boobs, be wearing a ton of makeup, and have ginormous boobs."

Just over one year later, artist Greg Lansky created Algorithmic Beauty, a statue imagining a 21st-century version of the Ancient Greek sculpture Venus de Milo with many signifiers of 21st-century beauty standards, chief among them being massive breasts.

(Greg Lansky's _Algorithmic Beauty_ | Censorship Added)

The Thinky Emoji-less version of the statue was originally posted to Lansky's Instagram in November last year. There, viewers can take in his modern interpretation of the classic marble statue, which shows the sculpture taking a selfie with a phone. The model also has several scars, suggesting she underwent multiple surgeries in pursuit of the perfect body.

About Algorithmic Beauty, Lansky explained:

"I created this work reflecting on the relationship between pain and feeling loved in a world driven by AI algorithms … 'Algorithmic Beauty' has no beauty filters. The marks from plastic surgeries are displayed with grace and dignity like the battle scars of an endless war no one can win."

On Instagram, several commenters were impressed. Rapper Tyga gave the piece three fire emojis, while another user unironically commented "This says a lot about society."

On Twitter, however, the piece wasn't received as positively. It was tweeted days after it was first posted to social media by user Seek the Finds, but sparked a round of viral discourse when @Mattybtweets69 discovered he'd essentially invented the piece 18 months ago.

As the humorous observation spread on Twitter into today, users had plenty of critiques about Lansky's concept and technique. User @punishedcait noted that "none of the scars are where they're supposed to be," pointing out the "tummy tuck" scar looked more like a C-section scar and the others on her breasts are consistent with breast reductions, not enhancements.

Others called it a "Boomer piece of Phone Bad artwork." One commenter condemned it as a "Hunt Down the Freeman type beat," which is a particularly devastating insult if you're familiar with the fan-created Half-Life 2 mod.

The critiques many people had for Algorithmic Beauty began to make more sense when they looked up Greg Lansky online and discovered that before he became a sculptor, he grew famous as one of the most influential pornographers on the internet. Lansky is the founder of adult film brands such as Blacked, Tushy and Vixen.

This made Lansky's pretensions of a deep message behind his piece ring hollow for some. As one commenter put it, "A pornographer put big stonking tits on the Venus De Milo and worked backwards to justify it, not even using the right surgery scars to do it."


Share Pin


Comments 11 total

Spaztastic Man

Uh huh, of course you made this as a statement about social media beauty standards, and not your incredibly obvious personal fetishes, hence why she's got the planet-sized cellulite ass.

1

Spaztastic Man

This is why I like NSFW artists more, they're honest. They know their work will be viewed by their audience as nothing more than jack-off material, it's what they strive for. They express their own horniness in a way that can be shared with a similar minded community, and the best of them take the time and dedication to get really good at it.

2

KoimanZX

It's funny how these types are the ones most likely to nitpick women's bodies. I am willing to bet that most of the pressure on women to augment their bodies comes from other women on social media. They seem to overestimate how shallow men are--especially since many of us men on this site just want any woman at this point.

-1

Quiet_boi

And of course it was basically 3D printed.
This dude would have taken years to make an actual statue out of marble with just a hammer and a chisel.

0

ed

"You painted a naked woman because you enjoyed looking at her, put a mirror in her hand and you called the painting 'Vanity,' thus morally condemning the woman whose nakedness you had depicted for you own pleasure."

or something like that

2

ConspiracyNut

"But the shoe fits!" declared the foot fetishist; and behold, the shoe fits.

2

Rhettorical

Maybe they're from breast reduction, but there are plenty of examples of botched bimbo-tier breast augmentations that result in those exact scars. Eva Notty has them.

2

Count Terranova

High effort boomer meme.

7

VeteranAdventureHobo

Apparently if you dig into the article, he didn't actually carve the statue, he had it machined from a 3d model. So its not actually that impressive, its basically just 3d printed

6

Spaztastic Man

Resident Mechanical Engineer here, Technically machining and 3d printing aren't considered similar processes. 3d printing is an ADDITIVE manufacturing process, meaning material is applied in layers to achieve the desired final product. This would've most likely been cut and finished using a 5-axis CNC robotic mill (essentially just a series of cutters attached to a robot arm). That would make it a SUBTRACTIVE manufacturing process.

However, where these two process do converge is in the modeling space. You can use STL's (or similar files types) to create the g-codes (programming language to run the machine) using CAD/CAM software (Autodesk Fusion 360, Autodesk Inventor, Siemens NX, and Solidworks to name a few.)

1
pinterest