The wiki site Fandom is likely well-known to lovers of pop culture as a sort of fandom specific Wikipedia clone where niche pop culture lore gets extensively documented.

However, that mission was compromised in the eyes of many earlier this month when McDonald's itself took over Grimace's page and later its own to advertise its June Grimace's Birthday promotion.

Fandom / McDonald's

Last week, Nathan Steinmetz, the primary writer of Grimace's Fandom page, noticed that the work he had put into the entry had been entirely replaced by an ad for Grimace's Birthday — part of an ongoing promotional campaign from the fast-food chain that notably includes the release of the viral "Grimace Shake."

Twitter / Humanstein

Speaking to Kotaku, Steinmetz expressed that while it was somewhat silly this debacle happened over Grimace, of all things, it did set a disturbing precedent for wikis to have their general purpose overwritten if a corporation wants to use its wiki as a marketing page.

"I think it probably sets a really bad precedent that an IP holder can approach Fandom or whoever and have user-generated content basically ‘suppressed’ and replaced with a press release," he said. "I get how dramatic it sounds to talk about the suppression of Grimace lore, but just about every pop culture property has thousands of hours of work put into these wikis."

Some online echoed – albeit hyperbolically – Steinmetz's concerns online.

Twitter / topherflorence

Currently, Grimace's page is back to being a standard Wiki-like entry, while the page for McDonald's itself is devoted to the advertising copy.

Though the situation will likely resolve soon as McDonald's ad campaign ends, it may indeed be a disturbing precedent should other companies with a more devoted following attempt a similar stunt.

One needs only imagine the sort of chaos that would ensue if, say, years of work put into a Sonic the Hedgehog wiki get erased ahead of a Sonic game.


Share Pin


Comments 10 total

Nukegirl

Considering what happened after Burger King did something somewhat similar several years ago, the scumbags at McDonalds responsible for this shouldn't be surprised if their abuse of the right to edit wikis results in others abusing that very same right in order to claim that Grimace has committed various crimes against humanity and/or that their food contains children, cyanide, live rats and pure, concentrated HIV.

1

Bobbobbobbob

Fandom's fucking terrible. Support independent wikis.

5

TheHolyEmpress

I love the irony of a fan site dedicated to the lore of a huge corporation's being taken over by said corporation. It's also a good example of the kind of garbage site Wikia/Fandom has become. I pity anyone foolish enough to venture there without a good ad blocker.

5

Lord DIO

I mean, McDonalds does realize they don't control the fandom page and admins can just revert the changes right?

2

SardonicRainboom

More to the point, do the admins themselves realize that?

1

Rhettorical

When Wikia became Fandom is when the downhill ride started. Fandom went from being a simple place to host wiki pages for games and fandoms, to being a makeshift social media site and advertising menace. I can't browse it on my phone anymore, the ads take up too much of the page and videos will sometimes autoplay with sound on for some dumbass reason.

Fandom is dying and I can only hope another site takes over in the future.

9

PhasmaFelis

I love the guy censoring "McDon*ld's" like they're too repulsive to even dirty his fingers with typing, which I would kinda sympathize with except you helped write their honest-to-God WIKI, buddy. You're already in this deeper than anyone who just eats a Big Mac occasionally.

5

answearingmachine

I mean… I can hate a corporation's current state and still think their history is neat

3

SardonicRainboom

A wiki is just meant to serve as a source of information about a subject. Contributing to McDonald's wiki doesn't (necessarily) support them in any way.

0
pinterest