'Hogwarts Legacy' Reassures Gamers It Has Nothing To Do With J.K. Rowling
Warner Bros. and Avalanche Software has assured fans that their new game Hogwarts Legacy, an action-RPG set in the Harry Potter universe, has nothing to do with J.K. Rowling.
"J.K. Rowling is not directly involved in the creation of the game, however her extraordinary body of writing is the foundation of all projects in the Wizarding World. This is not a new J.K. Rowling," says the team on the game's official website.
It's unclear if the statement has anything to do with Rowling's recent controversies or if it's merely a statement of fact. This year alone, Rowling ignited numerous backlashes over statements that many accused of being transphobic.
It's also unclear if Rowling will receive royalties for the title; Warner Bros. refused to answer that question when approached by Kotaku. The company put out a statement in June affirming its commitment to diversity while tiptoeing around any mention of Rowling.
"Warner Bros.’ position on inclusiveness is well established, and fostering a diverse and inclusive culture has never been more important to our company and to our audiences around the world," they said. "We deeply value the work of our storytellers who give so much of themselves in sharing their creations with us all. We recognize our responsibility to foster empathy and advocate understanding of all communities and all people, particularly those we work with and those we reach through our content."
After the game's announcement at the recent PlayStation 5 showcase, some fans called for a boycott of the game due to Rowling's recent behavior. The gaming and Harry Potter community was split on whether to support the game, with some believing any royalties Rowling may receive are meaningless compared to the work developers put into the game, while others argued that to support the title could be harmful to trans people.
I waited #HogwartsLegacy for long and I stand against JKR actions today, but developers and people involved into HP projects worked hard and shouldn't pay, as the actors in the movies. It's not right to ruin anyone else life/career because of her. HP is way more than that person. pic.twitter.com/trvu0ksYl2
— Barbara #百英雄伝 (@vanellopeb) September 17, 2020
honestly who cares if buying the new hogwarts game will support J.K. she's already got a new worth of 1 billion so it's not like a boycott would do anything. Also it's not just her i'm supporting by buying it, what about all the people making the game? #HogwartsLegacy
— DewSaMmich04 (@Dewsam04) September 17, 2020
And being a licensed game, a percentage of every sale goes straight to Joanne, and you know she’ll use part of her wealth and influence to hurt people like me. It’s not a 1-for-1 payout, but every sale not only pays her but also tells other powerful people that she has influence pic.twitter.com/JyolKEOBNt
— Crystal Frasier (@AmazonChique) September 17, 2020
Me seeing y’all hype up the game adaptation of the transphobic racist series as if removing JK’s name suddenly gonna stop her from getting money from royalties #HogwartsLegacy pic.twitter.com/g2YfXLxVgd
— surrender your money to adam sass (@nekuthebooklock) September 17, 2020
JK Rowling having 'no involvement' in #HogwartsLegacy as being reported means she didn't tell them what to put in it or play any part of the story dev. It does not mean she doesn't mske money off it. Buying this supports a bigot. Don't. pic.twitter.com/X8VEzM7hu1
— Amy Walker (@Amazing_Amy_W) September 17, 2020
If anything, the fracas underlines the bizarre reality of Harry Potter fandom in 2020: it's still a series beloved by many, yet those people also want little to do with the series due to the views of its creator. For fans, negotiating this dilemma is proving challenging.
Share Pin
Mzuark
"Woman who created entire franchise barred from being credited for it"
Fuck that, she should pull back her licenses.
Malakim
The worst part of Harry Potter universe is It's author, and how she handles the social media
Mzuark
You mean how she points out biological facts that you learn in health class?
Shui
This is a very VERY tricky situation.
1) I am not trans, nor ever will be, so I cannot truly understand how said people feel about even the slightest pennies going to JK. This makes the situation difficult for me to make definitive comments on.
2) Can someone source me if JK uses any money she has towards anti-LGBT stuff? The same way Chik-fil-A does?
3) As always, some people in the trans community can't learn to be fucking nice when preaching their stuff. "Trying to justify buying this game means you don't care about trans people" Holy shit, piss the fuck off. I get you're passionate, but your asinine generalizations are why you'll never be taken as seriously as you truly want to.
Uatu
Never turn your back on trans community… remember how it ends last time you tried in a Bear bar named "The f*ck*ng blue boy – Gay saloon".
Dracorex
#IStandWithJKRowling
Paradoxed
2+2=5, and if you say otherwise, we'll come and try to ruin your life.
No one gives a shit about this aside from the .01% of the most radical left in this country, who's opinions matter no more than the .01% of the most radical right.
iotacom
2000: Evangelicals burn Harry Potter books.
2020: Leftist try to destroy anything with J.K. Rowlings' name on it.
We've gone full circle, my dude. I never would have believed this back in the 2000's but here we are. All because she believes that men are adult human males and women are adult human females.
Dracorex
Sad, isn't it?
Shui
I don't think Rowling should be as intolerant as she is about trans people. Like it or not, these people exist with us now, being pricks to them isn't doing anyone any favors.
On the flipside, some Leftists would probably be taken more seriously by people outside of their circle if they weren't so goddamn aggressive.
view the rest of this conversation →
RickyEatsLions
"not receiving royalties"
I have 3 issues with this:
1) she is, she fucking owns the IP and makes money off a thing she created, that's how copyright works
2) even if she doesn't receive royalties who cares? She's one of the richest people on the planet and the game doesn't really have anything to do with her at all, all she did was approve it at the most
3) aren't these types of people always crying "if you don't like it don't buy it"… so don't buy it? I don't know what the problem is, I love harry potter and I always wanted to play a big budget harry potter game, I feel we haven't had that since the gamecube era so I'm definitely getting this on PS5
Mzuark
The fact that we're no longer allowed to support JK because some jackasses completely misinterpreted her tweets is fucking ridiculous. Transwomen cannot biologically menstruate. How the fuck is saying that transphobic?
Tigrerojo
Notch and Rowling are the best evidence to prove that the main reason most people aren't total cunts, is because they don't have the money to get away with it.
iotacom
You've got it the wrong way around. Once people have enough money that they're immune to the political morality mobs, they begin to say what they actually believe.
Notch and Rowling say what most people actually believe but are just too afraid to say it because people like you will destroy their lives.
Tigrerojo
yep, I'm sure most people are rabid, deranged incels indeed ;)
Uatu
I saw your limited income. I guess you are the exemption that confirms your statement.
:̶.̶|̶:̶;̶
These people seriously need to let go and read another book.
iotacom
Yeah, but then they'd have to grow up and become independent. They can't do that though. Maturity and independence are evil right-wing ideals.