Elon Threatens To Back Out Of Twitter Deal, Citing Twitter's Lack Of Disclosure Regarding 'Bots'
Elon Musk, though an apparent fan of artificial intelligence, is drawing the line at the supposed bots infesting his high-profile purchase of Twitter.
The billionaire recently sent a letter to Twitter claiming he was within his rights to "terminate" his agreement to purchase the social media website for $44 billion if Twitter did not provide him with all the data the site has on its percentage of spam-bot accounts.
"Musk believes Twitter is transparently refusing to comply with its obligations under the merger agreement," the letter stated, "which is causing further suspicion that the company is withholding the requested data." He claims that this is "a clear material breach of Twitter’s obligations under the merger agreement and Mr. Musk reserves all rights resulting therefrom, including his right not to consummate the transaction and his right to terminate the merger agreement.”
Musk has publically, though not formally, griped about this issue before, airing his grievances with Twitter's supposed lack of transparency regarding bots on the website itself. He then claimed the deal was "on hold" until Twitter verified that less than 5 percent of accounts using Twitter were "bots."
In response, Twitter CEO Parag Agrawal posted a lengthy thread discussing bots on the platform, saying they are sophisticated and sometimes difficult to detect, as they usually are created through a mix of human and automated work. Nevertheless, according to Agrawal, Twitter has determined that less than 5 percent of active accounts on Twitter are spam bots every quarter.
Furthermore, Agrawal asserted that externally performed analyses of Twitter's spam bot population will be inaccurate, as they lack the private information Twitter has and cannot release.
"Unfortunately, we don’t believe that this specific estimation can be performed externally, given the critical need to use both public and private information," he said.
Twitter has not yet responded to Elon Musk's latest salvo, but experts and laymen alike saw Musk's threat and his supposed focus on the bot issue as a signal that he wants out of his expensive purchase and is attempting to make a proverbial mountain out of a molehill in order to reverse course, perhaps without paying the $1 billion kill fee written into the agreement.
"He is trying to walk away from the Twitter deal, this is the first shot across the bow," Wedbush analyst Dan Ives told Reuters.
Twitter users who have watched as both Tesla and Twitter stocks have tanked following Musk's $54.20-per-share purchase of Twitter were amused at the latest chapter in what has become something of a circus.
We're certainly a ways away from finding out the ultimate fate of Musk's Twitter purchase, but for the betting folks among us, it seems that currently, the safe money may be on "not gonna happen."
Share Pin
PhasmaFelis
The is the zillionaire equivalent of trying to return the thing you ordered online while blackout drunk.
IfYaDVote-ReplyToWhy
You're a fool if you ever thought Elon was going to genuinely buy Twitter. The dude had a 9% stock investment into Twitter than significantly increased the shares worth when he announced he was going to buy it for $44 Billion. He has been delaying this deal for months now with some new excuse each week. When he backs out of this deal he'll be doing it when he can sell Twitter stock at a high profit thank tank Twitter all together. The guy has a history of manipulating the stock market and crypto market. This is just another stunt to add another hundreds of millions to his worth and fanboys will once again praise him for it.
Chewybunny
I praise him for it because if it means destroying twitter in the process of him getting even richer, then more power to him.
IfYaDVote-ReplyToWhy
That's the kind of attitude to why Billionaires like Musk feel they are invincible in acting horrible. There are far too many people who are willing to turn a blind eye to when someone acts horribly so long as they are getting some sort of benefit or it's screwing over a person, group, or company they don't like. You come off as nothing more but someone who doesn't care who is in front of the metaphorical trolley piloted by Musk, nor do you care to want to stop it. Not until it's heading down the track you or the people close to you are on. It's nothing more than a bootlicker mentality. When the trolley heads toward you, the thousands of others not currently on the track are just going to shrug it off because they'll have the same attitude as you.
Chewybunny
Sure. Precisely what horrible thing has Musk done?
>You come off as nothing more but someone who doesn't care who is in front of the metaphorical trolley piloted by Musk, nor do you care to want to stop it.
If the thing in front of the metaphorical trolley is the current state of Twitter, I want to put nitro into the fuel tank.
If I was running Twitter, a social network that has fueled political, cultural, and national division in this country, becoming a default public forum, while ignoring wholly the spirit and the legal understanding of Free Speech I'd probably have the moral compass of a Tobacco Lobbyist. I would completely understand if people would want to cheer my inevitable death on.
view the rest of this conversation →