(AFP, Twitter / @DaveLeeBBG)

In November last year, Elon Musk floated the idea of making everyone pay for Twitter, which led people to vow that if Twitter went behind a paywall, they would leave, and opine that the site itself would basically be doomed.

In a "second verse, same as the first" moment, Musk has again floated the idea that Twitter (or "X" depending on who you ask) needs to go behind a paywall, this time to Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

After a year of watching the site devolve into chaos after Musk proposes one often unpopular change after another, many on the microblogging platform expressed that they hope it happens so that Twitter / X well and truly dies.

Twitter / ProZD

Twitter / JUNlPER

The news spread after it was reported by Bloomberg tech reporter Dave Lee yesterday afternoon.

According to Lee, Musk told Netanyahu that paywalling Twitter is the only way to stamp out "bots" — a bogeyman Musk has long said is plaguing Twitter, to some skepticism.

Twitter / DaveLeeBBG

A video of the comments was tweeted from Netanyahu's account. In their discussion, Musk said Twitter is "moving to a small monthly payment for use of the X system," saying it's how he believes the site can combat bot armies (comments at roughly the 34-minute mark in the video below).


While Musk said the reasoning for paywalling Twitter would be to stamp out bots, others suspect it's because Twitter is notoriously unprofitable.

In July, Musk himself tweeted the company has a "negative cash flow" due to a "~50% drop in advertisers." It has often been speculated that Musk's erratic changes to the website, such as removing legacy checkmarks and opening the door for impersonation pranks, plus the increased frequency of Musk's own controversial tweets, which have been accused of being anti-vaxx and antisemitic, may have scared off many advertisers.


Share Pin


Comments 4 total

xoxin

Ain't no way I'd pay a subscription for a fucking social media site of all things.

Even a tiny one.

0

chausies

Obviously I'm against asking money universally for this shit. But…I'm also not sure of a good solution to fighting widescale bot spam besides asking for a small fee that's nothing for a single human to pay, but prohibitively large to spam on a large scale.

This is one of the main reasons that even the best crypto networks charge a nominal "fee" on transactions, to prevent people from spamming the network with shitty traffic.

Would I pay 10 cents a month for twitter? I'd fucking hate to, but it would realistically have basically 0 impact on my life outside of annoyance, while destroying a bunch of annoying-ass botnets.

Please give me some better ideas in the replies, if you have them #.#

-1

Adam

i think a dollar a month or whatever is realistically not, like, the worst though i wouldnt wanna do it on principle. a more pertinent question is, do i want to give elon musk my banking information? hell no brother

2

Gumshoe

Realistically, you're probably right, but it's amazing how big a mental gulf there is between paying $0 for something, and paying $0.01 for something, and Musk isn't going to settle for charging a penny if he does go through with it.

0
pinterest