On May 13th, the team at instant-messaging giant Discord made a statement on Twitter announcing a company rebrand. With the post, they shared the new logo for the app, featuring the same game-controller character "Clyde," only less sharp and more symmetrical. The logo also boasts a new, arguably more fun typeface. The rebrand comes on the sixth anniversary of the application.

In the tweet, Discord cites wanting to make the logo "friendlier," and links a further breakdown of the full changes and their reasoning. Beyond a logo change, Discord also changed the general in-app color palette to make it brighter, notably saturating the "blurple" color they're known for. On the font change, Discord explained:

We explored hundreds of different fonts before landing on this very unique font face that we believe captures the playfulness of Discord. We even tweaked some elements of the font and letters so it’s easier to read than how it originally was.

Predictably, the rebrand sparked mixed-to-negative reactions from many users of the application. Some were critical of the changes to beloved mascot Clyde, but most took aim at the new font. In fact, Twitter user @RobPlayinGames commented on the post the day it was made with a photoshopped version of logo removing the font, challenging users to replace it with something better. This inspired numerous comments, many offering jokingly worse fonts, and others offering true competitors and going the extra step to change Clyde as well.

In a more serious realm of discussion, one user tweeted complaining that the new shade of blurple potentially causes distress for people with visual processing problems, resulting in eyestrain and driving them away from the app. Discord responded to the tweet that day, promising to relay the issue internally.

Of course, not everyone was displeased with the rebrand. Many other users tweeted their praise for the app's new look, evidencing more than a little bit of, shall we say, discord among users of the app. All things considered, the rebrand definitely could have looked a lot worse — such as the new minimalist Firefox logo.


Share Pin


Comments 11 total

DessertArbiter

Do people really get migraines this easily? How do they even use the internet?

0

AtlasJan

at first, I thought the new logo was an older design because it looks kinda like the wierd schlubby designs of the early 2010s.

0

ed

Everything about this except the new logo font is fine. I really wonder why they picked that over… almost anything else.

0

Weimario

I'm fine with the logo, not fine with the font or the way-too-blue "blurple." But whoever put that Soyjak in the frontpage image clearly isn't fibe with people not accepting it.

19

Weimario

*fine. How hard is it to make editable comments, guys

1

Neptune Vasilias

Even regular Wojak as-is would've done the job better (despite still being Wojak in the end), except instead of painting people's displeasure as…I don't know, "soyboy rage", it would be disappointment.

(P.S. yes please, let us edit comments already i don't want to delete my comment like two times over just to correct errors)

0

The Nate

I was getting tired of the old blurple anyways, but I'd really like if they added a color editor so I could make Discord match how I have my Windows theme set up:

1

Deluxxxe17

The "blurple" is definitely worse than before, but I don't really see the problem since it's just the logo. The actual program is still dark grey.

1
pinterest