(X / @skyler_higley)

BBC aired the 60th-anniversary special episode of the long-running sci-fi television show Doctor Who on Saturday but subsequently caught flack from several conservative internet users for its decision to cast a British-Indian actor as the famous scientist Sir Isaac Newton.

The beloved TV show, which follows a time-traveling alien named Doctor Who on his mission to protect humanity, has a history of bending real-world events, but this marks the first time that the show has changed the race of a historical figure.

"Wild Blue Yonder" is part of Doctor Who's three-part special and shows actor David Tennant reunited with Catherine Tate as they crash land into an apple tree and cause Isaac Newton to come up with the concept of "gravity."

However, the show also shows Newton calling gravity "mavity" for the rest of the episode, implying that the universe the Tardis crash landed into may be an alternate timeline.

Nevertheless, the decision reignited another "race swapping" debate surrounding BBC as some internet users took offense at what they perceived as the network's attempt to rewrite history.

Others agreed with the idea that the casting was unnecessarily inciting controversy, as expressed by X user @AnimarchyYT, who wrote, "Look. I hate to agree with the anti-woke brigade. But was this really necessary? We know Isaac Newton was the pastiest of pasty anorexic autistic white boys. Seems like doing it for the sake of doing it."

But others took the casting decision as part and parcel of Doctor Who's reality-bending premise, joking about other times the show has changed historical facts and figures. X user @TrilbeeReviews noted this in a tweet amid the debate and said, "But Charles Dickens didn't blow up ghosts. Agatha Christie didn't fight off a Giant Wasp. Mary Seacole didn't treat Sontarans. Van Gogh didn't stab an invisible chicken," in reference to various Doctor Who segments.

Yet other users took the outrage as an opportunity to double down on the comical notion that famous and well-documented historical figure Isaac Newton wasn't white, as seen in a post by @skyler_higley where he jokes, "Why do white people lose their minds when you change the race of a fictional character 🙄"

The controversy mirrors another from late 2017 when BBC One and co-producers Netflix released promotional material that showed the Greek hero Achilles would be played by the actor David Gyasi, a Black British actor, for its Troy: Fall Of A City miniseries that subsequently sparked memes and parodies.


Share Pin


Comments 9 total

Revic

Is the CHARACTER Indian though, or just the actor? Actors do sometimes portray characters of a different race/ethnicity than themselves.

0

tino768

That and the "mavity" running gag was funny. People need to stop shitting themselves over stuff like this.

0

SSmotzer

Why does anyone care?
The most popular piece of historic media is the musical Hamilton, where he, and the rest of the Founding Fathers, were all black.

2

Gumshoe

I expect most of these people will be equally upset with Hamilton. It kind of doesn't matter if the character is fictitious, or if it's a version of history that is overtly diverging significantly from the actual historical record and trying to use a changed race for humour or to make a point of that (like Hamilton or this). Recasting any white character as a not-white character is part of the Great Replacement or something.

2

winton overwat

Probably because muh historical accuracy, but Doctor Who has never even pretended to be historically accurate

0

Uatu

The twisted wokist beast is released.
Me : Eating caramelized popcorn

0

Revic

Pretty sure if you tried to caramelize corn it would just catch on fire.

0

Pokejoseph64

Eh preferable over his Marvel comics incarnation

0
pinterest